A complete comparison of the Mazda CX-9 VS Toyota Land Cruiser Prado — specs, prices, pros and cons, and live used listings across KSA.
From SAR 0
From SAR 249,550
| #1 Mazda CX-9#1 | #2 Toyota Land Cruiser Prado#2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price Comparison | ||
| Starting at | 0 SAR | 0 – 273,815 SAR |
| Engine & Power | ||
| Engine | 2,500 cc · 4 cyl | 2,400 – 2,800 cc · 4 cyl |
| Horsepower (bhp) | 226 – 230 hp | 161 – 267 hp |
| Torque (Nm) | 420 Nm | 400 – 430 Nm |
| Acceleration 0-100 Km/h (sec) | 8.3 – 8.4 s | 11.7 s |
| Top Speed (Km/h) | 210 km/h | 175 – 200 km/h |
| Fuel Economy (L/100 Km) | 8.4 – 8.5 L/100km | 8.5 – 9.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 87 – 110 L |
| Gears | 6 | 5 – 8 |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Drive Type | All Wheel Drive / Front Wheel Drive | All Wheel Drive |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Diesel / Petrol |
| Measurements | ||
| L×W×H | 5.1 m × 2.0 m × 1.7 m | 4.8 / 4.9 m × 1.9 / 2.0 m × 1.8 / 1.9 / 1.9 m |
| Wheelbase (meters) | 2.9 m | 2.8 / 2.9 m |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 2,340 kg |
| Trunk Capacity (liters) | 407 L | 742 L |
| Overview | ||
| Body Style | SUV Crossover | SUV Crossover |
| Seating Capacity | 7 seats | 7 seats |
| Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Features | ||
| Key features | ABS Anti-Lock Brake SystemAirbagsAlloy RimsAUX InputBluetoothClimate ControlCruise ControlElectric SunroofFog LightsKeyless EntryLeather SeatsMoonroofMP3 SupportNavigation SystemOff-Road KitOff-Road TyresPanoramic Glass RoofParking SensorsPower LocksPower MirrorsPower SeatsPower SteeringPower WindowsPush Button StartRadioRear CameraSecurity SystemSpoilerUSB Port | ABS Anti-Lock Brake SystemAir ConditioningAirbagsAlloy RimsAUX InputBluetoothCD PlayerClimate ControlCool BoxCruise ControlDVD PlayerElectric SunroofFog LightsKeyless EntryLeather SeatsMoonroofMP3 SupportNavigation SystemOff-Road KitOff-Road TyresPanoramic Glass RoofParking SensorsPower LocksPower MirrorsPower SeatsPower SteeringPower WindowsPush Button StartRadioRear CameraSecurity SystemSpoilerUSB Port |
The Mazda CX-9 wins for its spirited performance, offering faster acceleration at 8.3 seconds and a higher top speed of 210 km/h for a more engaging drive.
The Toyota Land Cruiser Prado is the clear winner for practicality, providing a much larger trunk capacity of 742 L compared to the CX-9's 407 L.
The Toyota Land Cruiser Prado excels with its larger fuel tank (up to 110 L) and renowned robust build, offering greater peace of mind and range for extended trips across KSA.
The Mazda CX-9 offers better fuel economy at 8.4 L/100km, making it a more economical choice for daily commutes and city driving compared to the Prado.
56,000 km · Riyadh
SAR 126,000
32,000 km · Riyadh
SAR 95,000
70,000 km · Khobar
SAR 106,000
70,000 km · Riyadh
SAR 105,000
39,000 km · Jeddah
SAR 87,000
94,000 km · Riyadh
SAR 146,000
